Including genetic groups as fixed or random effects in large scale single-step genomic predictions
Genetic groups are often used in genetic evaluations to account for selection that cannot be accounted for by kinship. The genetic groups can be fitted as random or fixed effects, both in traditional BLUP and in single-step genomic predictions (ssGBLUP). In this study, we investigate how inclusion of genetic groups affect the predictive ability and bias in a large-scale three-trait ssGBLUP model for kg of milk, fat percentage, and protein percentage in Norwegian Red cattle. Including genetic groups as random effects rather than fixed effects reduced bias of breeding values. Specifically, for genotyped animals and ungenotyped animals with genotyped offspring and with sparse pedigree data, the bias of the Mendelian term of breeding values was reduced by about 25%, when fitting genetic groups as random compared to fixed.
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).