Selection of sequence variants to improve genomic predictions
Keywords:
genomic prediction, reliability, sequence variant, whole genome sequencingAbstract
Methods of selecting sequence variants were compared using candidate sequence variants within or near genes for 444 Holsteins from run 5 (July 2015) of the 1000 Bull Genomes Project. Test 1 included single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for 481,904 candidate sequence variants within or near genes. Test 2 also included 249,966 insertions and deletions (indels). After merging sequence variants with 312,614 high-density (HD) SNPs and editing, Test 1 included 762,588 variants and Test 2 included 1,003,453. Imputation quality from findhap was assessed by keeping 404 of the sequenced animals in the reference population and randomly choosing 40 animals as a test set. Their sequence genotypes were reduced to the subset in common with HD genotypes and then imputed back to sequence. Predictions were tested using HD imputed genotypes for 26,970 progeny-tested bulls and 2015 data of 3,983 validation bulls with daughters that were first phenotyped after August 2011. Percentage of correctly imputed variants averaged 97.2% across all chromosomes in Test 1 and 97.0% in Test 2. Prediction reliability improved only 0.6 percentage points in Test 1 when sequence SNPs were added to HD SNPs and was only 0.4 points higher than HD SNPs in Test 2 when sequence SNPs and indels were included. However, selecting the 16,648 candidate SNPs with largest estimated effects and adding those to the 60,671 SNPs used in routine evaluations improved reliabilities by 2.7 percentage points (67.4% vs. 64.7%) on average across traits compared with 35.2% for parent average reliability. Thus, genomic prediction reliabilities can improve when adding selected sequence variants.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).