Imputation efficiency with different low density chips in French dairy and beef breeds
Low density chips are appealing alternative tools in order to reduce genotyping costs. Such a chip is already commercially available. The best way to use low density chips is to impute data to a more dense coverage such as the standard 50K genotype. Two alternative in silico chips are presented and include markers selected to optimise Minor Allele Frequency and spacing. The objective of this study was to compare imputation accuracy of these custom low density chips with the commercially available 3K chip. Three French dairy and beef breeds were studied: Holstein, Montbéliarde and Blonde d’Aquitaine with respectively 4,037, 1,219 and 991 50K-genotypes. Markers were masked for the validation population in order to mimic a low density genotype. Imputation was realised with Beagle software. 95% to 99% of alleles were correctly imputed depending on the breed and the low density chip. Custom low density chip gave better results. The gain to use 6K chip was found to be even higher for beef breeds such as Blonde d’Aquitaine. A low density chip with 6,000 markers is a valuable genotyping tool that is suitable for both dairy and beef breeds. Such a tool can be used for pre-selection of young animals or large screening of the female population
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).