Combination of test day somatic cell count and incidence of mastitis for the genetic evaluation of udder health

Authors

  • T C Pritchard
  • R Mrode
  • M P Coffey
  • E Wall

Abstract

Genetic parameters were estimated in a joint analysis of somatic cell count (SCC) and mastitis (MAS) in Holstein/Friesian cows for the first three parities using a random regression model (RRM). There were 67,175, 30,617, and 16,366 cows with records for SCC in parities 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The incidence of MAS was 14, 20, and 25% in parities 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Average daily heritability estimates (h2) were 0.11, 0.14, and 0.15 for SCC in parities 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Corresponding estimates were 0.05, 0.07, and 0.09 for mastitis as a binary trait (MAS) and 0.06, 0.07, and 0.12 as a count trait (NMAS). Genetic correlations (rg) between parities were different to one; thus indicating that separate parities should be treated as separate traits. Genetic correlations between SCC at days in milk (DIM) and MAS within parities were generally medium in value, varying from 0.41 to 0.74. It is intended that the new parameters will be used in setting up a national evaluation system for the joint analysis of SCC and MAS.

Downloads

Issue

No. 44 (2011): Proceedings of the 2011 Interbull meeting

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

    1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

    1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).