Simulation study on Mendelian sampling variance tests
To be able to assess the quality of the data sets and national evaluation models, Interbull and national evaluation centers need a validation test. Thus far, two Mendelian sampling variance test methods have been proposed: Mendelian sampling (IB4) and full model sampling (FMS) variance estimation methods, but neither has been implemented. The aim of this simulation study was to dissect the behaviour of both methods under two different scenarios for bulls and cows. Scenario A served as a control that should pass the test. For Scenario B, a yearly increase of 2% in phenotypic variance was generated. Without heterogeneous variance adjustment, it should fail the test. As an alternative, an analysis of MACE model residuals could be a simple tool to check the data quality. On average, a yearly increase of 1.9% and 1.4% in genetic variance were observed for cows and bulls in Scenario B without HV adjustment. The IB4 test performed well when applied to cows and it was able to detect the simulated heterogeneity in genetic variance. A yearly increase of 1.3% in the variance of MACE residuals was observed in Scenario B without HV adjustment. This was consistent with the genetic variance estimates for bulls, indicating that the analysis of MACE residuals could be utilized to check the data quality for bulls.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).