Avoiding Bias From Genomic Pre-Selection in Converting Daughter Information Across Countries
Keywords:single-step genomic evaluation, foreign data, selection bias
Methods to include both foreign and genomic information in single-step or multi-step evaluations were developed and compared using the U.S. national Jersey database. Breeders have exchanged and converted genetic evaluations of bulls across countries for decades, but traditional evaluations may become biased by pre-selection on genotype. When foreign and genomic data were added to the equations, daughter yield deviations computed from only domestic daughter records were very stable. Those could be exchanged internationally, thereby avoiding the difficulty of deregressing genomic evaluations. A final step in the multi-step method simply inserted the genomic evaluations and held them constant during iteration instead of adjusting the data vector and equations. For genotyped young bulls, multi-step evaluations were correlated by .966 to single-step evaluations computed with an algorithm that did not require inverting the genomic relationship matrix. Accuracy was similar but regressions were closer to expectation for the single-step evaluations.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).