Reliability Increases from Combining 50,000- and 777,000-Marker Genotypes from Four Countries
Keywords:
genomic evaluation, international exchange, marker density, imputationAbstract
Genomic predictions were compared on U.S. scale after combining 50,000 (50K) and 777,000 (HD) marker genotypes across countries. The genotyped Holsteins included 161,341 animals with five marker densities including 1,510 with HD. Imputation was more accurate with FImpute than with findhap across the five densities. Reliability of HD predictions minus reliability of 50K predictions averaged only 0.4%. For 50K predictions, reliability for the combined reference population was higher than for domestic only, with the gain averaging 2.6% for Holsteins and 3.2% for Brown Swiss when 50K genotypes were added for 3,593 foreign Holstein and 732 Brown Swiss bulls that had no U.S. daughters prior to August 2008. Gains should be larger with 7,974 foreign Holstein and 870 Brown Swiss bulls in the May 2012 reference population. Multi-trait methods were not more accurate than single-trait for Holsteins, but multi-trait reliability averaged 1.4% higher than single-trait for Brown Swiss, perhaps because of lower genetic correlations between Brown Swiss populations. International exchange improves accuracy and decreases cost of obtaining additional phenotypes and genotypes.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).