Should the markers on X chromosome be used for genomic prediction?
Keywords:genomic prediction, genotype imputation, the X chromosome
AbstractThis study investigated theaccuracy of imputation from LD (7K) to 54K panel and compared accuracy ofgenomic prediction with or without the X chromosome information, based on data ofNordic Holstein bulls. Beagle and Findhap were used for imputation. Averagedover two imputation datasets, the allele correct rates of imputation usingFindhap were 98.2% for autosomal markers, 89.7% for markers on the pseudoautosomal region of the X chromosome, and 96.4% for X-specific markers. Theallele correct rates were 98.9%, 91.2% and 96.8%, respectively, when usingBeagle. Genomic predictions were carried out for 15 traits based on 54K markerdata, imputed 54K for test animals, and imputed 54K for half of referenceanimals. GBLUP models with or without residual polygenic effect were used forgenomic prediction. For all three data sets, genomic prediction using allmarkers gave slightly higher reliability than prediction excluding the X chromosome.Averaged over 15 traits, the gains in reliability from the X chromosome rangedfrom 0.3% to 0.5% points among the three data sets and models. Using a model with a G-matrix accounting for sex-linkedrelationship appropriately or a model which divided genomic breeding value intoan autosomal component and an X chromosomal component did not led to betterprediction based on the present data where all animals were bulls. A modelincluding polygenic effect did not recover the loss of prediction accuracy dueto exclusion of the X chromosome. It is recommended using markers on the X chromosomefor routine genomic evaluation.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).