Single step evaluations using haplotype segments
Keywords:
haplotype segments, genomic relationships, genomic breeding valuesAbstract
The low reliability of genomic evaluations in some breeds may be improved by regression on ancestral haplotypes instead of all available markers. The aim of this paper was to examine the use of haplotypes in constructing genomic relationships for single step evaluations. BayesB model was fitted to all markers simultaneously to estimate marker effects, using deregressed proofs (DRP) of reference bulls as data. Phased 5-marker haplo-blocks were constructed from the markers with the highest absolute effect size and 4 adjacent markers. Haplo-blocks and their estimated variances were then used to compute genomic relationships. Evaluations used cow DRP of milk and protein as data, weighted by effective record contribution. Estimated genomic breeding values (GEBV) were validated from regression coefficients in a linear model. The validation reliabilities for milk over marker-based methods were improved by up to 4% with 1500 segments and 40% weight on the pedigree. Reliabilities were smaller for protein but comparable when the weight on pedigree was 40%. Inflation levels for both traits were higher with haplo-blocks than individual markers. Haplo-blocks appeared to be beneficial and indicate a need to further assess the optimal number of haplotypes and the weight on pedigree for single step evaluations.Downloads
Published
2013-09-20
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).