The Process of Validating National Genomic Predictions
Keywords:
genomic validation, dairy cattle, national genetic evaluationAbstract
In last years many countries have implemented genomic evaluation for dairy cattle breeding. To validate national genomic models, Interbull introduced a GEBV test (Mäntysaari et al. 2010) in August 2010. Almost all countries or populations have passed the GEBV test for protein yield, many of them also for milk or fat yields. However, an extension of the GEBV test to functional traits seemed to be more difficult, with unsatisfactory test results. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to describe the process of validating national genomic predictions in details using German Holstein population as an example. Several ways for improving genomic prediction were discussed with regard to genomic validation and passing the GEBV test. Increasing residual polygenic variance in SNP effect estimation was shown to be effective to make genomic prediction less biased, and it increased regression slope of the GEBV test, even for female fertility traits with low heritabilities. Using truncated national and MACE conventional evaluations for genomic validation should guarantee the validity of current national conventional evaluation model and the right time frame of phenotypic data, which is especially important for countries sharing a common genomic reference population. The current GEBV test was shown to be an important and valuable test for validating national genomic predictions.Downloads
Published
2012-05-11
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).