Usability of different genetic evaluation validation tests in a population subjected to a strong genomic selection and in testing the single-step genomic evaluations
Interbull trend validation tests II and III and the dGEBV prediction test were applied on genetic and genomic evaluations of production traits in Nordic Red Dairy cattle evaluations. For all tests, both the animal model and the single-step GTBLUP evaluations were applied to a control model and to a faulty model where the calving age effect was removed. The trend test II was able to detect faulty models, while the test III had insufficient power because of only few bulls returning to service. Both trend validation tests seemed to work equally well for genetic and genomic evaluations. The dGEBV prediction test indicated problems in both genomic evaluation models, although results for inflation and bias were worse with the faulty model. Given the good properties of test II, an alternative approach was proposed for the calculation of daughter yield deviations. The approach is based implicitly on MME equations and requires only the estimates of breeding values and pedigree.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).