Experience with single-step GEBV validation in CRV Holstein-Friesian breeding program
Validation of genomic evaluations is an important step in the development cycle. The usual way to validate is to regress deregressed conventional EBV of young bulls from a full evaluation on predicted GEBV from a reduced evaluation, where some recent years of data have been omitted. Some alternative approaches to validation of (single step) GEBV were tested. The types of validation performed were regression of GEBV or deregressed GEBV on predicted GEBV of either validation bulls or validation cows. Additionally we compared validations on DEBV DGEBV for some traits using either in house validation methods or the newly implemented Interbull validation software. The results indicate that validations on DGEBV produce satisfactory results. Validation using cow GEBV can be used when the number of validation bull is too limited (< 300 bulls). Validation on DEBV seems no longer to be a good approach, since input GEBV are often more reliable than the DEBV they are tested against.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).