Modeling identical twins and clones in genetic evaluations
Abstract
Identical animals cause more complex relationships to model in genetic evaluations. The USA evaluation currently includes 4,762 pairs of natural identical twins, 1,776 split embryos, and 530 nuclear transfer clones from cells of other embryos, calves, or adults, plus 7 million other genotyped animals. Genetic effects for the 7,068 animals reported to be a clone or copy of another animal were linked to the source animal, and their own effects were removed from the relationship matrix. The model retained separate permanent environmental effects for each cow. For progeny of clones, the source animals are substituted as their sires and dams. After completing the evaluation, the reverse process restored the actual sires and dams and duplicated the evaluations of source animals to their clones for publication. Pedigree inbreeding coefficients increased slightly for animals with a paternal ancestor and a maternal ancestor that were clones of each other. Genomic predictions improved by estimating just 1 polygenic effect instead of modeling the copies as full sibs. Milk production of adult clones was not significantly affected, but their fertility and health traits were below expected. Several AI companies now market cloned bulls. The revised model better evaluates identical twins, cloned animals, and their progeny.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).