A Sire-Dam Threshold Model for U.S. Single-step Calving-Ease Evaluation
Abstract
The traditional U.S. calving ease (CE) evaluation currently uses a single-trait sire-maternal grandsire (sire-MGS) threshold model implemented in a stand-alone pipeline separate from other trait groups, while the genomic evaluation uses a multi-step approach with de-regressed proofs as input. As the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) transitions national evaluations toward single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP), a sire-dam threshold model using animal-model pedigree was investigated to better represent maternal information while accommodating incomplete calf identification in U.S. data. CE records from 2002 onward were analyzed using single- and multi-trait threshold models, with first and later calvings modeled either jointly or as correlated traits. Variance components were estimated from an informative subset using Gibbs sampler, and breeding values were subsequently obtained at national scale under both traditional pedigree-based BLUP (pBLUP) and ssGBLUP threshold models using a Newton-Raphson algorithm. Genetic correlations between first and later calvings were high for direct (0.95) and maternal (0.84) effects, supporting adoption of the single-trait model. In the final model, direct and maternal heritabilities were 0.092 and 0.115, respectively, with a genetic correlation of −0.40. Genetic trends from pBLUP and ssGBLUP were very similar, whereas comparisons with the current domestic sire-MGS pBLUP evaluation showed breed- and component-dependent re-ranking, particularly for the maternal effect. The sire-dam threshold model provides a practical framework for integrating CE into the CDCB single-step evaluation system while maintaining continuity with the current U.S. interpretation of the published Sire Calving Ease and Daughter Calving Ease traits.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).